You prepared for a mock interview for an entry-level Product Manager position at an enterprise software company, focusing on aligning your skills with job application keywords. I've successfully conducted a mock interview using an AI tool, practicing how to articulate your experience, including using the STAR method. I've analyzed the feedback provided by the AI tool, identifying both your strengths and specific areas for improvement in your interviewing skills. I've created a plan for your further development, demonstrating your commitment to continuous growth as a product manager.

Had a chance to learn how disruptive innovation and AI led structural changes can be managed through core product management principles. Also, how in the age of AI these principles focus on macro as well micro aspects of enterprise

great course, I learned a lot on post launch activities.

It’s wonderful learning

Superbly!

It was end to end product management learning inclusive of AI which is essential with current market needs.

Me pareció que se puede dar más ejemplos de uso de IA en la gestion de un PM

Very informative

The course content was comprehensive and covered a wide range of topics, which provided valuable exposure to current business and market trends. However, there are several areas that need improvement to enhance the learning experience: Content Quality and Flow: While the topics were holistic and detailed, the overall structure and flow were not as organized as expected from a Microsoft training program. Some sections felt repetitive, and certain parts appeared AI-generated, which made them slightly confusing. Delivery Format: Many tools were introduced through short videos with rapid transitions, making it difficult for learners to follow and absorb the information. A slower, more structured approach would improve clarity. Hands-On Practice: Although the tools presented were useful, there was no practical environment for learners to apply what they learned. Virtual labs should be integrated into the course, especially for those who do not have access to the required software. Time Allocation: The time assigned for reading and assignments was unrealistic. For example: Reading modules were allocated 10 minutes, whereas they required at least 1.5 hours. Assignments were given 30 minutes, but realistically needed 2.5 hours or more. Adjusting these timeframes would significantly improve learner engagement and comprehension. Human Review and Practical Exercises: Human revision of the content is essential to ensure clarity and remove unnecessary repetitions. Additionally, practical exercises in a virtual environment should accompany all tools explained in the videos to reinforce learning.

The course doesnt have real human touch. Not at all worth for learning and understanding the real fundamentals.