Learner Reviews & Feedback for Introduction to Philosophy by The University of Edinburgh
About the Course
Top reviews
EG
May 13, 2020
Clear, complete, rigorous, user friendly, open to different levels of engagement, great and wide extra materials and peer discussion, covers the Big Questions and the mains ways to focus them.
RT
Dec 7, 2022
Very informative and enjoyable. Pitched at the right level for beginners. Provided an appropriate level of challenge. Also plenty of further reading links available at the end of each module.
1801 - 1825 of 2,276 Reviews for Introduction to Philosophy
By Sergio A C F
•Oct 20, 2016
good
By Kyle K S
•Oct 17, 2016
good
By Тәжібай Г Б
•Oct 12, 2024
...
By Anisha R
•Jun 22, 2021
100
By Pradip G
•May 25, 2021
Yes
By ساره ي ا
•Dec 11, 2020
...
By Giovanna C
•Oct 25, 2024
:)
By JOCELYN N O
•Sep 7, 2023
OK
By Aditi B
•Sep 27, 2021
..
By Кеңесов Н М
•Aug 10, 2021
👍
By Teresa I A G
•Apr 17, 2021
(:
By Lorena J D R
•Apr 29, 2018
Ir
By Diana M
•Oct 4, 2015
:)
By Olzhas O
•Nov 27, 2024
1
By Жанатұлы М
•Oct 7, 2024
-
By Бекболат А Р
•Oct 7, 2024
-
By Жаңбырбай Б
•Sep 27, 2024
1
By Zahra K
•Aug 17, 2024
l
By Avishek “ s
•Mar 14, 2022
V
By Anindya B
•Aug 25, 2021
By Suman P
•Jul 7, 2021
p
By Jose G S
•Jun 21, 2017
G
By Shiferaw H
•Jan 18, 2017
5
By Maarten R
•Nov 24, 2016
I
By Cliff S
•Aug 22, 2015
I enjoyed this course very much. Like many survey courses that are well-conceived, this one stimulated enthusiasm for learning more about some of the topics. So much so in my case that I have enrolled in another course from the University of Edinburgh relating to philosophy and science. I expect it will be equally thought provoking as its delivery involves some of the same faculty.
I believe this course would be improved if there was a mechanism for constructive feedback on missed exam questions that illustrate how the questions at hand are integral and in context to the presentations and supplemental readings (some of which I pursued). Simply referring a student back to the course outline does not assist learning when a student does not understand why a chosen answer is incorrect in context. I realize this is a tall ask for an online course. In my own experience as a university faculty member having developed computer assisted instruction and simulations (physiology and anesthesiology) there is no replacement for contact and conversation with an engaged teacher whose interest lies in helping people learn. That said, I reflect that my constructive comments are made in light of my overall satisfaction that this course has succeeded in stimulating interest in learning more about the interface and complementary nature of science and philosophy.
Borrowing a phrase from the course itself, "well done".